Rune public page
VV-008 — Financial Models (Rune vs PySAM)
This study focuses on whether Rune financial logic stays consistent with PySAM-style benchmark expectations once production and cash-flow assumptions are coupled.
This static HTML snapshot is generated at build time to expose route-specific metadata, crawlable summaries, and structured content for search engines and AI assistants before the client app hydrates.
Benchmark context
Finance outputs are often where technical trust breaks down for buyers, lenders, and project developers, so this page surfaces that parity work directly.
What the study found
Published target: AEP abs error < 2.00%. Reported result: 1.56% max abs error. Interpretation: -0.44 pp vs threshold.
- Tests production-linked finance outputs rather than isolated formulas.
- Keeps bankability framing visible for procurement and lender review.
- Shows Rune inside the stated parity threshold against the reference workflow.
References and source material
These references summarize the public benchmark context and the report package that supports the claim.
- PySAM benchmark framing
- Rune VV-008 financial-model validation report
- Production-coupled finance consistency checks
Primary technical artifact
The full report is available as a public PDF for engineering review and source citation.